- meeting over much unhapiness
- wbc says they will consider all responses.
- wbc says no point in waiting until me becomes academy
- wot happen when me becomes an academy? Academy has right to set own da. To make changes wld hve to go through same process
- sibling protection if there is still child at school
- how will it work for siblings? Sibling protection if you live in the current ME area
- how are WBC taking new building in Earley to account, taken in to account for south of wbc not in north
- Wbc yes we have not worked strategically with rdg
- Q are wbc missing a strategic opportunity to work with Rdg?
- Q should wbc wait for change until Bulmershe improves? No answer light heckling from floor
- adjudicator defined da as one where demand meets supply, this change will prevent that- how wbc justify? No justification
- Q pls clarify removal of linked schools. They say it doesn't privilage schools as criteria is too low. Will consider changing
- Q has wbc taken account of safety on routes to school with inc no. WBC say they haven't done any work on it
- trying to defend their consultation much heckling
- WBC admissions forum and Executive will make final decision
- adjudicator said do not change tie breaker, why you changing it. WBC no answer?
- Q causes meeting to laugh as it points out madness of plan
- Q who do the speakers work for Ans they work for WBC
- wbc we don't know how it will effect traffic, but will check
- how will wbc address potential growth of traffic becoz of changes
- Wot do wbc say parents who have lived in ME area for mre than 10yrs. Wbc say sorry and its tough- heckling
- Q how mny changes btween prop 1 and prop 2. Wbc say that new proposal based on feedback from public. Wbc say no2 better
- wbc say decision not politically driven
- wbc closed Ryeish Green becoz of falling roll
- Q is the process a political process caused by political decision to close Ryeish Green
- wbc ans system is clear and you will at least know you've been stuffed by the council
- Q why give bottom of Lwr Early priority over nearer children when hardly any children from there go to bulmershe atm
- Q distance? Wbc reinforce fact that entrance to me based on distance to me minus distance to bulmershe
- wbc say they are investing in Bulmershe and visit school to allow Parents to make informed decision
- Q wot plans wbc have to improve Bulmershe to bring it up to Maidenerlegh stds
- wbc stick to line that all children will live within 3 miles and can walk or cycle
- wbc say tht plan will increase walking to school on balance. But admit that they don't really know whether it will inc walking
- is plan greener. Wbc say yes! more will walking much heckling
- show of hands for who walked to mtg, majority walked
- wbc say trying to solve diff probs
- why wbc using 2 diff systems in borough 4 catchment area
- wbc admit a lot of children will be disadvantaged by new catchment
- wbc measures dist in straight lines, if have to provide transport wbc will lay it on, safety on route will be considerd
- how did wbc calculate distance to bulmershe esp for young girls walking through dark st
- 1st abt walk distance policy, if child has to travel more than 3miles and is wbc child they will have bus funded
- Q+A session abt to start
- wbc. Spokesbod says tht public meeting not a good way to consult hoho
- wbc admit that plan is biased towards Lower Early children
- wbc admit that not many children in Park will get in
- wbc made everybody laugh by claiming nonsense
- wbc removing linked school criteria
- wbc going through process for admissions
- wbc wants people to continue to write in with comments
- meeting kicks off looks better organised this time
Notes from Consultation meeting at Maiden Erlegh 17th Jan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)